commit 88a389a033b3f1599e00e1f62ccfc2e096aa3b84 Author: luynoe25732555 Date: Tue Oct 21 16:22:37 2025 +0200 Add Johnson & Johnson Vaccine and Blood Clots diff --git a/Johnson-%26-Johnson-Vaccine-and-Blood-Clots.md b/Johnson-%26-Johnson-Vaccine-and-Blood-Clots.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..59393b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/Johnson-%26-Johnson-Vaccine-and-Blood-Clots.md @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +
We now have been reporting on the incidence of rare blood clots following the AstraZeneca vaccine in Europe. And now we need to report, only one week later, on a very related situation with the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine. In a joint assertion from the CDC and FDA, they really useful pausing use of the J&J vaccine until reviews of blood clots will be investigated. The situation is considerably completely different now from one month in the past with the AstraZeneca vaccine, but the dilemma is similar. As of April 12, more than 6.8 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen ) vaccine have been administered within the U.S. CDC and FDA are reviewing knowledge involving six reported U.S. J&J vaccine. In these instances, [BloodVitals test](https://king-wifi.win/wiki/User:MaynardLopez6) a type of blood clot referred to as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) was seen in combination with low levels of blood platelets (thrombocytopenia). All six instances occurred among women between the ages of 18 and 48, and signs occurred 6 to thirteen days after vaccination.
+ +
This could be very similar to the AstraZeneca circumstances - CVST associated with low platelets (a blood part that initiates clotting) largely in younger girls. The incidence right here is a bit of lower than one case per million vaccines, which is extremely uncommon, and just one death out of almost 7 million. It’s difficult to estimate what number of COVID deaths had been prevented by these identical vaccines, however it's a minimum of within the hundreds. These stories presented a dilemma for [BloodVitals SPO2](https://gitea.oio.cat/alba949905954) the CDC and FDA. On the one hand, [BloodVitals test](http://repo.bpo.technology/garfieldwolfor) these are uncommon unwanted side effects, dwarfed by the benefits of the vaccine in the midst of a surge of a deadly pandemic, when we are in a race in opposition to the emergence and spread of more infectious variants. Also, recommending a pause within the J&J vaccine may improve vaccine hesitancy overall, including of the two mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) which have up to now had no critical unwanted side effects. Arguing for the pause is the fact that these cases are similar to the AstraZeneca instances, and both of these vaccines are modified adenovirus vaccines (once more, very different from the mRNA vaccines).
+ +
AstraZeneca is a chimpanzee adenovirus and J&J is a human adenovirus, [BloodVitals test](https://curepedia.net/wiki/Blood_Oxygen_Levels:_Normal_And_Low_-_What_That_You_Must_Know) so they are completely different viruses, however the expertise is analogous. Further - the affiliation with low platelets could suggest an autoimmune etiology, which is plausible following a vaccine. Vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 can end result in the uncommon growth of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia mediated by platelet-activating antibodies towards PF4, which clinically mimics autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. They had been also involved with getting the word out to physicians as shortly as attainable to be looking out for this syndrome, which must be treated in a different way than ordinary blood clots. They usually needed individuals who just lately acquired the J&J vaccine to be looking out for any signs which may indicate CVST - severe headaches, confusion, dizziness, trouble speaking or difficulty understanding speech, numbness or weakness in the face/arm/leg, bother seeing, bother strolling, BloodVitals SPO2 lack of steadiness or coordination. Finally they had been involved about the appearance of transparency, and that failure to act might sap confidence in the general vaccine program.
+ +
So they acted out of what they known as "an abundance of caution". In addition they didn't ban use of the vaccine and the FDA did not revoke emergency use authorization. They simply really useful pausing use, and let the states determine how greatest to implement that recommendation. The recommendation has attracted each reward and criticism. This is because they had been coping with a no-win state of affairs, particularly relating to public perception and issues about vaccine hesitancy. Whether or not they acted or not, the antivaccine forces on social media would exploit the situation to impress as much concern and doubt concerning the vaccines in general as they'll. There isn't a decision that might prevent this, so you would possibly as nicely do what's greatest scientifically and then just clarify the choice as finest you possibly can. The scientific calculus is all risk vs benefit, and here the situation may be very different from the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is critical to Europe’s vaccine technique, particularly in poorer nations.
\ No newline at end of file